Performance chip John Deere K Serie 550 4.5 94 hp

-15%

15% lower fuel consumption

	kw	hp	Nm
Original	69	94	0
P-TRONIC	88	119	0
Wins	19 (28%)	25 (27%)	0 (0%)

Description

P-Tronic tuning boxes for turbo diesel engines can provide up to 30% more power and 35% more torque. They also reduce diesel consumption with equivalent driving. These benefits come with no risk to mechanical components. P-Tronic never exceeds the standards prescribed by car manufacturers and retains all the original safety features.

Your John Deere K Serie wins 25 hp and 0 Nm

With the P-Tronic PT-A-59999 tuning box, you can exploit the full potential of the diesel 550 4.5 94 hp engine in your John Deere K Serie. Its power increases to 119 hp (+ 27%) and its torque is boosted by %. All while cutting of the agricultural vehicle consumption by 15%.

Secure connections

The PT-A-59999 box connects to the of the injection system using connectors supplied by the manufacturer. There is no risk for your John Deere ? the box acts as a custom external reprogrammer and guarantees optimum operating safety.

Customer opinions Fitting diagram Shipping conditions Exchange and return

P-Tronic box-unit on Alfa Romeo 156 JTD

P-Tronic box-unit on Alfa Romeo 156 JTD I bought a second hand car with a P-Tronic in it. At first I was a bit frightened about driving with it, and I took it out after a few weeks. But when it had been taken off, my car (An Alfa Romeo 156 JTD) had much less punch and used more fuel! I had it put back, and I've never had any problems with it.   Rudy D., Brussels.

I should have outfitted my Ranger sooner...

Hello, I hesitated for a long time to put a box in my Ranger. 200 hp is already a big thing but I was curious to see how far my 3.2 could go. Honestly, it's incredible. I'm discovering a new vehicle. It's as if it's lightened by the box, so much power and torque is enormous. I should have decided earlier ;-) Have a nice day! Pierre H., Metz

1.5 l/100 less fuel consumption on Ford Ranger 3.2

I bought your box-unit to reduce the fuel consumption of my Ranger 3.2 TDCI. I was expecting better but I went from 10.5 l to about 9 l anyway. As I make 30.000 per year, I will have amortized it in a little more than a year, which is not bad. Emile C., Arlon

See other testimonials »

1037.00 €

1220.00 €