Performance chip John Deere 6000 Serie 6190R 6.8 190 hp

-15%

15% lower fuel consumption

	kw	hp	Nm
Original	140	190	800
P-TRONIC	189	257	1192
Wins	49 (35%)	67 (35%)	392 (49%)

Description

P-Tronic tuning boxes for turbo diesel engines can provide up to 30% more power and 35% more torque. They also reduce diesel consumption with equivalent driving. These benefits come with no risk to mechanical components. P-Tronic never exceeds the standards prescribed by car manufacturers and retains all the original safety features.

Your John Deere 6000 Serie wins 67 hp and 392 Nm

With the P-Tronic PT-A-45100 tuning box, you can exploit the full potential of the diesel 6190R 6.8 190 hp engine in your John Deere 6000 Serie. Its power increases to 257 hp (+ 35%) and its torque is boosted by 49%. All while cutting of the tractor consumption by 15%.

Secure connections

The PT-A-45100 box connects to the of the injection system using connectors supplied by the manufacturer. There is no risk for your John Deere ? the box acts as a custom external reprogrammer and guarantees optimum operating safety.

Customer opinions Fitting diagram Shipping conditions Exchange and return

I put it in my Bora 3 months ago

Super box-unit! I put it in my VW Bora 1.9 TDI 3 months ago. At the beginning, I really pushed it. But then I calmed down. Now I use about 1 litre less fuel.   Stijn P., Hasselt.

Roundness and economy with the BMW X5 45e 394 hp

For budget reasons, I chose the BMW X5 Xdrive 45e rather than the Porsche Cayenne Hybrid. To get closer to the performance of the Cayenne, I added one of your tuning boxes to the engine, because I know you are one of the best tuning shops for BMW, even for the newer engines. Once fitted, accelerating gives the roundness of a bigger engine. With the 8-speed ZF gearbox, there is no loss of driveability and consumption now reaches the figures claimed by the manufacturer. Thank you! Harry W, Perth (Australia)

1.5 l/100 less fuel consumption on Ford Ranger 3.2

I bought your box-unit to reduce the fuel consumption of my Ranger 3.2 TDCI. I was expecting better but I went from 10.5 l to about 9 l anyway. As I make 30.000 per year, I will have amortized it in a little more than a year, which is not bad. Emile C., Arlon

See other testimonials »

1037.00 €

1220.00 €